• Current Issue
  • PDF Subscription Access
  • LOGIA Online
  • About Us
    • Mission Statement
    • Masthead
    • History
    • Donate
    • Luther Academy
  • Five Centuries of Lutheranism
  • Subscriptions
  • Books
  • Audio
  • Back Issues
  • Contact
  • Upcoming Themes
  • Call for Manuscripts
  • View a sample issue of LOGIA!
  • Menu

LOGIA

A Journal of Lutheran Theology
  • Current Issue
  • PDF Subscription Access
  • LOGIA Online
  • About Us
    • Mission Statement
    • Masthead
    • History
    • Donate
    • Luther Academy
  • Five Centuries of Lutheranism
  • Subscriptions
  • Books
  • Audio
  • Back Issues
  • Contact
  • Upcoming Themes
  • Call for Manuscripts
  • View a sample issue of LOGIA!

LOGIA is a publication of Luther Academy

Follow us on Facebook and X (Twitter)

Schnorr_von_Carolsfeld_Bibel_in_Bildern_1860_019
Schnorr_von_Carolsfeld_Bibel_in_Bildern_1860_019

Leviticus for the Christian: The Priest and Holiness

January 25, 2013 in Forum

–By Ryan Ogrodowicz  

Rome’s enforcement of priestly celibacy stems from a specific interpretation of the levitical priesthood. The Confutation, the Papal document countering the Augsburg Confession, references the Old Testament priest as “foreshadowing” Rome’s sanction against priestly marriage. The logic is, since priests were commanded to cover “shameful flesh” (Exod 28:42), then priests of today, who have received “Christ as legislator” must go above and beyond by attaining holiness in the form of celibacy (Kolb, Robert and James A. Nestingen, eds., Sources and Contexts of the Book of Concord, [Fortress Press, 2001], 124). The Lutheran Confessions dismantle this notion and, along with pointing out the barrage of sexual sins caused by celibacy, also emphatically remind us from Scripture that marriage is a “divine right” and the “natural desire of one sex for the other sex is an ordinance of God in nature and for this reason is a right” (Ap XXIII, 12).

Even though the levitical priesthood has been abused, it’s still worthwhile to look at the function of priests in Leviticus.

First, they were selected by God from the tribe of Levi (Exod 28:1). Initially consecrated for service in Exodus, the levitical priests were men chosen to serve the congregation on behalf of God. Contrary to a modern context replete with self-appointed “pastors,” ordination in Leviticus was not determined by a person. It was always God’s merciful selection. Out of his gracious word males of the line of Levi were chosen for priestly service and even then within certain parameters (cf. Lev 21:16–24).

Second, these chosen servants of YHWH were adorned with sanctified garments and received holy food. At the consecration of Aaron and his sons, both man and clothing are consecrated (Lev 8:30) to protect them from death (Exod 28:43). As for food, they were allotted a portion from the people’s grain offerings (6:14–16), peace offerings (7:33–36) and the priestly guilt offering, a “most holy” offering reserved for the priest that could only be consumed in the consecrated Tent of Meeting (7:1–6). While the details of each offering are intricate, from a distance we see God feeding his priests holy food taken from offerings reserved for God. God gives holiness to his priests, also a New Testament theme, where the holy priesthood of Christ receives holy food in the Divine Service; bread and wine consecrated as his body and blood for forgiveness and nourishment.

Lastly, these priests protected the people. Handling offerings and determining when someone was clean in order to enter the holy Tabernacle meant the priests functioned as necessary barriers between God and the sinner. They safeguarded the congregation from a God whose holiness is unfathomable and consuming, glorious and dangerous. Safety, then, did not come with the territory. Handling holy sacrifices and serving as appointed liaisons between congregation and a holy God is anything but “safe.” Danger and divine holiness go hand in hand. So Leviticus emphasizes that approaching God had to be done in the manner dictated by his word. We only need to look to the death of Aaron’s priestly sons in Leviticus 10 to see a God who cares very much about how his priests come before him. Automatic impunity was not granted the priests, as exemplified by Aaron’s sons and their death by divine fire for approaching God in an unauthorized way.

God still cares how his people stand before him and has spoken how sinners will stand before him and live. The Christian is a priest able to come before God on account of the great high priest, Jesus Christ, in whom we are clothed in his righteousness adorning us in Holy Baptism (Gal 3:27). God imputes the gifts of holiness and purity to sinners by faith in Jesus, who gives his body as the all-atoning sacrifice for sin.

Seeing the levitical priest through the lens of the gospel reveals their importance and what they really foreshadow. Leviticus is not a pretext for more legalism. It is the glorious word of God foreshadowing the royal priesthood established by the blood of our God and priest, Jesus Christ.

The Rev. Ryan Ogrodowicz serves as pastor of Victory in Christ Lutheran Church in Newark, Texas.

Tags: celibacy, exegetical theology, Leviticus
Prev / Next
 

Recent Posts

Featured
Screenshot 2026-07-18 172511.png
July 18, 2026
The Three Estates: A Collection of Luther Quotations
July 18, 2026
Read more →
July 18, 2026
34-3-cover-for-website.jpg
July 25, 2025
Holy Trinity 2025 Issue: Marriage and Celibacy
July 25, 2025
Read more →
July 25, 2025
Register for the Confessionalism Seminar
March 29, 2023
Register for the Confessionalism Seminar
March 29, 2023

Register for the Confessionalism Seminar and learn more about the church’s commitment to her confession in the 19th century and today.

Read more →
March 29, 2023
 The Women's "Speaking" at Corinth (1 Cor. 14:34)
March 13, 2022
The Women's "Speaking" at Corinth (1 Cor. 14:34)
March 13, 2022

However, I submit that the possibility of Paul’s trying to limit the women’s disruptive speech at Corinth pushes our understanding off in directions that are speculative at best, and harmful at worst. For example, it should be highly offensive to women nowadays that the apostle apparently pillories them for being “chatty” at church—when Paul is concerned throughout the chapter with order (see especially 14:33a, 40). It plainly is not the case that the apostle singled out women for special censure (14:34a)—when he also enjoins “silence” upon any would-be tongue-speaker (if there is no one to interpret, 14:27-28), or prophet (if a revelation is made to another sitting there, the first should keep silent, 14:30).

Read more →
March 13, 2022
Book Review: Debating the Sacraments
May 6, 2020
Book Review: Debating the Sacraments
May 6, 2020

When Lutheran seminarians learn about the controversy over the Lord’s Supper, it normally features Luther as protagonist and Zwingli as antagonist in a debate concerning the literal interpretation of the words of institution, all playing out in the public forum of 1529’s Marburg Colloquy. In her most recent book, Amy Nelson Burnett offers an alternative view …

Read more →
May 6, 2020